sheriffexe: (Default)
sheriff swanson ([personal profile] sheriffexe) wrote2017-01-13 11:13 am

[ THE DOCTOR ]

DOCTOR

The message comes by carrier pigeon actually, which is a pretty weird way to deliver a message but of course, it's thematic. A very pretty looking brown pigeon swoops down out of the sky to wherever Natalie just so happens to be that afternoon and holds out its leg. The message is short and simple:

Got a job for you. Meet me in front of the doctor's office at dusk. No show, no job. Keep it a secret, rewarded very well.

- Hal

P.S. Burn this.
And that's it. Of course, if Natalie chooses to listen to the message, she will find the Sheriff in front of the clinic at dusk. She'll be greeted with a tip of his hat and one word:

"Doctor."

And then he holds out a small notebook. Looks like Natalie's been chosen for one of those roles that were mentioned. Good luck.


QUICK NAV
PRIVATE CONVERSATIONS | STATUSES | PROFILES | LOCATIONS | GRAVEYARD | MAIN NAVIGATION


robitussin: (running nude down the street)

[personal profile] robitussin 2017-01-18 01:03 am (UTC)(link)
Fair enough.

[Even so, she's slipping one of the scalpels into her trouser pocket. Small enough to hide, and it could come in handy.]

Got it. I had a few questions about the rules listed here, too, if that's cool.
robitussin: (you've heard those lies before)

[personal profile] robitussin 2017-01-18 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
So. I heard you mention during your little spiel that whoever was left at the end of all this would have the choice whether all of us come back or not. But, it says in the section about rewards that we shouldn't ask to leave, because "all participants will be leaving upon completion anyway". Direct quote, your bosses words, not mine.

[A pause, as she figures out the best way to phrase this.]

If it says in the rules that we all get to leave, but there's the possibility a situation is going to occur that prevents the majority of us from leaving... Doesn't that make this rule necessarily invalid? And if that rule is invalid, why are we expecting to uphold any of them?

[She. She's trying so hard.]
robitussin: (growing up unstable)

[personal profile] robitussin 2017-01-20 05:26 am (UTC)(link)
So... Wait, let me get this straight, which of the two is it? If we work hard or whatever by your standards, we get sent home or somewhere better as long as the person who decides what happens to us isn't a huge asshole and decides to fuck all of us over?

Or, even if they are a huge asshole, the people who worked hard by your standards get to go somewhere cool, it's just the people who didn't do much who get stuck here if the last person standing chooses?
robitussin: (they're sure this cure)

[personal profile] robitussin 2017-01-20 05:31 am (UTC)(link)
Actually, I'm pretty sure the second one is extremely fair. How is the first one more fair than that?
robitussin: (and i'm trying to enjoy it)

[personal profile] robitussin 2017-01-20 07:00 pm (UTC)(link)
So... Wipe out the obvious assholes. That's your big advice?
robitussin: (am i feeling)

[personal profile] robitussin 2017-01-20 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)
So the other rounds all ended badly. Figures. But, the whole option about erasing everyone's memories and starting over - has anyone taken that before?

[A small pause, and then a question she's not sure she wants the answer to.]

...Is that why we couldn't remember how we got here?